On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 21:46 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches fix cases where the documentation above a function definition > is not consistent with the function header. Issues are detected using the > semantic patch below (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). Basically, the semantic > patch parses a file to find comments, then matches each function header, > and checks that the name and parameter list in the function header are > compatible with the comment that preceeds it most closely. Hi Julia. Would it be possible for a semantic patch to scan for function definitions where the types do not have identifiers and update the definitions to match the declarations? For instance, given: <some.h> int foo(int); <some.c> int foo(int bar) { return baz; } Could coccinelle output: diff a/some.h b/some.h [] -int foo(int); +int foo(int bar); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
