On Do, 2016-09-22 at 19:16 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > For starters make sure the patches land actually on the list. > > How do you think about to take another look at this update suggestion > also by the usual archive interfaces? > > * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9344521/ > > * https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<f7eb26ad-39be-2918-627b-5f4981d07808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I fail to see the point in this change. On init failure qdev will be released anyway, and whenever the fields are initialized or not when kfree() is called doesn't matter at all. > > Only the cover letter arrived here. > > Would you like to clarify any more technical difficulties around > the desired message exchange? Hmm, not sure what happened. According to the kernel.org link the patch has been sent to dri-devel (where I'm subscribed), but the patch never landed in by mailbox for some reason. cheers, Gerd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
