On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:32:18PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 15/09/2016 à 19:34, Marcelo a écrit :
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> > > to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> > > hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> > >
> > > Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> > > 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > I just noticed you didn't include netdev@ in the destinations.
> >
> > Is your patch going to be tracked somewhere else? It's not showing up in
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=66309&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
> >
> My fault, get_maintainer lists netdev@ but I missed it.
>
> Should I resubmit or is it ok?
I guess you need to resubmit then, as it's not showing up in patchwork.
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
