On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:54:07AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> > >> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> > > Constify local structures. > >> > > > >> > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > >> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > >> > > >> > Just my two cents but: > >> > > >> > 1. You *can* use a static analysis too to find bugs or other issues. > >> > 2. However, you should manually do the commits and proper commit > >> > messages to subsystems based on your findings. And I generally think > >> > that if one contributes code one should also at least smoke test changes > >> > somehow. > >> > > >> > I don't know if I'm alone with my opinion. I just think that one should > >> > also do the analysis part and not blindly create and submit patches. > >> > >> All of the patches are compile tested. And the individual patches are > > > > Compile-testing is not testing. If you are not able to test a commit, > > you should explain why. > > Dude, Julia has been doing semantic patching for years already and > nobody has raised any concerns so far. There's already an expectation > that Coccinelle *works* and Julia's sematic patches are sound. > > Besides, adding 'const' is something that causes virtually no functional > changes to the point that build-testing is really all you need. Any > problems caused by adding 'const' to a definition will be seen by build > errors or warnings. > > Really, just stop with the pointless discussion and go read a bit about > Coccinelle and what semantic patches are giving you. The work done by > Julia and her peers are INRIA have measurable benefits. > > You're really making a thunderstorm in a glass of water. Thanks for the defense, but since a lot of these patches torned out to be wrong, due to an incorrect parse by Coccinelle, combined with an unpleasantly lax compiler, Jarkko does have a point that I should have looked at the patches more carefully. In any case, I have written to the maintainers relevant to the patches that turned out to be incorrect. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
