> I'd prefer this to be combined into fewer patches > that each will address several issues of one type, I understand your concern a bit in principle. > ie. put all label renames into one patch, Are any of my update suggestions controversial here? > all size determination improvements into another one and so on. I am unsure about the acceptance for the selected software change opportunities. So I chose a very specific patch granularity intentionally. I tend to provide some change ideas for each affected function implementation individually. I imagine that this way should support the recombination of update steps to some degree already, shouldn't it? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
