[PATCH V2] sched/fair: Fix that tasks are not constrained by cfs_b->quota on hotplug core, when hotplug core is offline and then online.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In case that CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH is turned on
and tasks in bandwidth controlled task group run on hotplug core,
the tasks are not controlled by cfs_b->quota when hotplug core is offline
and then online. The remaining tasks in task group consume all of
cfs_b->quota on other cores.

The cause of this problem is described as below:

1. When hotplug core is offline while tasks in task group run
on hotplug core, unregister_fair_sched_group() deletes
leaf_cfs_rq_list of tg->cfs_rq[cpu] from &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list.

2. Then, when hotplug core is online, update_runtime_enabled()
registers cfs_b->quota on cfs_rq->runtime_enabled of all leaf cfs_rq
on runqueue. However, because this is before enqueue_entity() adds
&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list on &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
cfs->quota is not register on cfs_rq->runtime_enabled.

To resolve this problem, this patch makes update_runtime_enabled()
registers cfs_b->quota by using walk_tg_tree_from().

Signed-off-by: Jeehong Kim <jhez.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6488815..63b376d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4373,17 +4373,27 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer);
 }

-static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq)
+static int __maybe_unused __update_runtime_enabled(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
 {
-	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	struct rq *rq = data;
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq)];
+	struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth;

-	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
-		struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth;
+	raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
+	cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF;
+	raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);

-		raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
-		cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF;
-		raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
-	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
+
+	/* register cfs_b->quota on the whole tg tree */
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, __update_runtime_enabled, tg_nop, (void *)rq);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux