> But the change-log in this patch says "I did some stuff". > What stuff did you change? Which review comments did you > tend to? I imagine that I could increase the description granularity to a detail level which you might also not like. >>>> +put_device: >>>> + platform_device_put(pdev); >>>> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to add device %s\n", name); >>> >>> ... and remove this line. >> >> Do you really want that this error message should be deleted? >> >> How does this response fit to your request to introduce such a message >> for the function "add_numbered_child" (on 2016-06-08)? >> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg1162299.html >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/8/467 > > You've lost the context. I interpreted the suggested message adjustments as separate changes. So I wondered about a different handling for the Linux modules "dm355evm_msp" and "twl-core". > The "..." is meant to intimate that it > follows on from a previous comment. In this case: > >> > status = platform_device_add_data(pdev, pdata, pdata_len); >> > if (status < 0) { >> > dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't add platform_data\n"); >> >> Please take the opportunity to convert these to dev_err()s. > > So, convert the specific dev_dbg() calls to dev_err() and remove the > contentless one at the bottom. It seems then that you would like to get rid of an error message at the end while increasing the importance of a related information. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
