> I'm unsure if you're not re-submitting because you're waiting for an > answer for me or not. I found your five commits (on 2016-06-29) for this patch series sufficient in principle. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=d313cdde71ec9a5c327a515c37a0dca2cca00de5 > If you are, here it is. And, don't do that. :) I find this feedback a bit strange. > Please submit your patch-set *not* connected to this, now very > tangled web of submissions, complete with all the Acks you've > accrued. I would find it nice if another one of my update suggestions could be integrated after a bit of feedback evolved for a special source code search pattern. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9199519/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9208925/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9210291/ It seems to be harder to achieve acceptance similar to the others. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
