Re: [patch] qla2xxx: small cleanup in qla2x00_wait_for_hba_ready()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/3/16, 11:42 AM, "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>The "if (test_bit(UNLOADING..." line was indented one tab more than it
>should have been.  There was an extra parenthesis around the
>qla2x00_reset_active() function call.  I lined up the conditions a bit
>so that it shows how they group together.
>
>Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
>index 2674f4c..1dd8650 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c
>@@ -899,12 +899,12 @@ qla2x00_wait_for_hba_ready(scsi_qla_host_t *vha)
> 	struct qla_hw_data *ha = vha->hw;
> 	scsi_qla_host_t *base_vha = pci_get_drvdata(ha->pdev);
> 
>-	while (((qla2x00_reset_active(vha)) || ha->dpc_active ||
>-	    ha->flags.mbox_busy) ||
>-		test_bit(FX00_RESET_RECOVERY, &vha->dpc_flags) ||
>-		test_bit(FX00_TARGET_SCAN, &vha->dpc_flags)) {
>-			if (test_bit(UNLOADING, &base_vha->dpc_flags))
>-				break;
>+	while ((qla2x00_reset_active(vha) || ha->dpc_active ||
>+		ha->flags.mbox_busy) ||
>+	       test_bit(FX00_RESET_RECOVERY, &vha->dpc_flags) ||
>+	       test_bit(FX00_TARGET_SCAN, &vha->dpc_flags)) {
>+		if (test_bit(UNLOADING, &base_vha->dpc_flags))
>+			break;
> 		msleep(1000);
> 	}
> }

Looks Good.

Acked-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�ޗ�����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux