>> Can you follow expectations around the proposed refactoring of any
>> function implementations?
>
> I don't understand both questions. Maybe you need to give examples?
I suggest to try the following script (semantic patch for working with
the Coccinelle software) out on the discussed source files.
@checking_function_calls_directly@
identifier checker, retval, work;
expression list el;
statement is, es;
type rt;
@@
rt checker(...)
{
<+...
-retval = work(el);
if (
- retval
+ work(el)
)
is
else
es
...+>
}
Do you find such a source code transformation useful?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
