On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:26:33AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > >>> if (atomic_read(&priv->sleepstatus.status) == 0) { > > > >>> rw_data = GCR_B_DOZE; > > > >>> - retval = > > > >>> - ks7010_sdio_write(priv, GCR_B, &rw_data, sizeof(rw_data)); > > > >>> - if (retval) { > > > >>> + if (ks7010_sdio_write(priv, > > > >>> + GCR_B, > > > >>> + &rw_data, > > > >>> + sizeof(rw_data))) { > > > >> > > > >> A multi-line function call in an if test does not look nice at all. The > > > >> original code was an easy-to-read expectable pattern. > > > > > > > > I agree. I am not strict on the 80 char limit, especially in cases like > > > > the above. > > > > > > Would you try an other source code formatting for the suggested change pattern? > > > > I don't understand the question? > > I think the original code was fine. x = blah(); if (x) ... is a perfectly > familiar kernel coding pattern. There is no benefit in terms of > performance or understandability in dropping the variable. I certainly agree to that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature