> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:20:36 +0100 > > The mempool_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL > and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c b/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c > index 9d209a0..e1d751a 100644 > --- a/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c > +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c > @@ -1009,10 +1009,8 @@ static void __init dwarf_unwinder_cleanup(void) > rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(cie, next_cie, &cie_root, node) > kfree(cie); > > - if (dwarf_reg_pool) > - mempool_destroy(dwarf_reg_pool); > - if (dwarf_frame_pool) > - mempool_destroy(dwarf_frame_pool); > + mempool_destroy(dwarf_reg_pool); > + mempool_destroy(dwarf_frame_pool); > kmem_cache_destroy(dwarf_reg_cachep); > kmem_cache_destroy(dwarf_frame_cachep); > } > How do you think about to integrate this update suggestion into another source code repository? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
