Am 16.07.2016 17:08, schrieb SF Markus Elfring: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:36:36 +0200 > > The variable "temp_storage" was eventually reassigned with a pointer. > Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/functiontables.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/functiontables.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/functiontables.c > index 024e22e..735aeb0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/functiontables.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/functiontables.c > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int phm_dispatch_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, > void *input, void *output) > { > int result = 0; > - void *temp_storage = NULL; > + void *temp_storage; > > if (hwmgr == NULL || rt_table == NULL) { > printk(KERN_ERR "[ powerplay ] Invalid Parameter!\n"); > @@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ int phm_dispatch_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, > printk(KERN_ERR "[ powerplay ] Could not allocate table temporary storage\n"); > return -ENOMEM; > } > - } > + } else > + temp_storage = NULL; > > result = phm_run_table(hwmgr, rt_table, input, output, temp_storage); > kfree(temp_storage); the handling of rt_table->storage_size == 0 is so better visible. IMHO in this case the function could return directly either with -EINVAL; or with 0; -> more direct more obvious. if (rt_table->storage_size == 0 ) return 0; re, wh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html