On 07/03/2016 07:37 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
This is likely that checking 'phy_provider' instead of 'phy' is expected here. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c index cf8f38d..1c366f8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int mtk_mipi_tx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) phy_set_drvdata(phy, mipi_tx); phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate); - if (IS_ERR(phy)) { + if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
Dan already send a patch for that: http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg112031.html Regards, Matthias
ret = PTR_ERR(phy_provider); return ret; }
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html