On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 16:40 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > > Can you please fix your email client to _not_ send References: > > and In-reply-to: headers when sending new patches? > I prefer to associate some patches with previous relevant > discussion directly. > > > > > > Even better would be to use git send-email for these patches. > This command can also support a parameter like "--thread", can't it? yes, good to see you can read documentation. > Would you like point any more views out about communication styles? Actually, yes. Just because you've submitted a similar patch, an independent patch like this one, doesn't need to refer to those patches you've previously submitted. For instance, your "References:" for this email imply some association to a patch series you submitted "[PATCH v3 0/3] gianfar: Fine-tuning for gfar_ethflow_to_filer_table()" for no obvious reason. What is this reason? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
