RE: [patch -next] qed: potential overflow in qed_cxt_src_t2_alloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> In the current code "ent_per_page" could be more than "conn_num" making
> "conn_num" negative after the subtraction.  In the next iteration through the
> loop then the negative is treated as a very high positive meaning we don't put a
> limit on "ent_num".  It could lead to memory corruption.
> 
> Fixes: dbb799c39717 ('qed: Initialize hardware for new protocols')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

I don't think we can actually hit an issue here, since the number of iterations
was also calculated based on conn_num, so this can only happen on the last
iteration.

Regardless, yours is the correct way to go. Thanks, Yuval.

Acked-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux