Re: atmel: potential underflow in atmel_set_freq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Smatch complains that we cap the upper bound of "fwrq->m" but not the
> lower bound.  I don't know if it can actually happen but it's simple
> enough to check for negatives.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, 1 patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git:

d9739a26fbca atmel: potential underflow in atmel_set_freq()

-- 
Sent by pwcli
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9061371/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux