Re: [patch] kexec: potetially using uninitialized variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/14/16 at 01:58pm, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:38:19PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > I think we can modify the logic a bit to make code simple. Thus gcc will
> > not complain about any more, and the logic is earier.
> 
> This is a Smatch warning, not a GCC warning.  If you think the new code
> is clearer, that's fine but don't just silence the warning to please
> Smatch.  I'm pretty sure I can silence this warning in Smatch.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

Hi, Dan.

If not a GCC warning, I'm fine to fix it in Smatch, since the code logic
is clear enough.

Thanks
Minfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux