On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:50:07 -0500 (EST)
Chunyu Hu <chuhu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks so much for catching this. I missed this check. I was just
> thinking that this fail was nearly impossible, and during my tests
> I didn't hit any warn, so i missed this. You taught me a lesson.
> BTW, How did you hit the warn? a special gcc version / feature?
>
> You are right, It should be a 'goto out', this has already tested by me.
>
> if (!type->flags) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
>
> Hi Steve,
> I'm so sorry for this. Can I resubmit a v2 for my part of the patch?
>
What I push to linux-next doesn't get rebased. Please just send a patch
to fix this on top of what's already in my for-next branch.
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
