On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Did you find more of these? > > it doesn't matter much either way, but if you do multiple such patches, One or two. I already sent the fixes. I think it was applied. > I'd suggest using a single PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() instead of IS_ERR()+PTR_ERR(). > > I have found a couple of drivers in which that leads to better object > code, and avoids a warning about a possibly uninitialized variable > when the function gets inlined into another one (which won't happen > for this driver). Huh? I sent one where I could have done that but I deliberately didn't because I wanted the uninitialized warning if I made a mistake. It sounds like you're working around a GCC bug... regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
