On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:08:23AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> >> That's also my experience from maintaining wireless-drivers for a year, > >> >> this seems to be a "hit and run" type of phenomenon. > >> > > >> > Should we be looking for someone to run a "wireless-driver-cleanups" > >> > tree? They could handle the cleanups and trivial stuff, and send > >> > you a pull request a couple of times per release...? > >> > >> Not a bad idea! But I don't think we need a separate tree as applying > >> patches from patchwork is easy. It should be doable that we add an > >> account to patchwork and whenever I see a this type of trivial cleanup > >> patch I'll assign it to the cleanup maintainer and whenever he/she > >> thinks it's ready he assigns the patch back to me and I'll apply it. > >> > >> The only difficult part is finding a victim/volunteer to > >> do that ;) > > > > I can be a volunteer (victim?). Though i donot know much about > > wireless-drivers, but I do know a little about cleanup patches. > > And maybe, in the process I will start knowing wireless-drivers. > > I think it's better that you have prior experience with linux-wireless > before doing something like this. You can start by reviewing patches and > providing Reviewed-by tags. Sure, I am starting that way. I checked in patchwork and I do not see any checkpatch related patch pending (except staging, which Greg will handle). I think you must have cleared all of them. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
