On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 08:18 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > As Heiko already answered, you could propose a lot of this kind of changes > > with just minor benefit. I do not want to push them in single patches. > > Thanks for your clarification. > > > > Either there is a cleanup patch for explicit initialisation of > > local variables in the whole qeth driver, > > Is there any more fine-tuning cooking in the background? Not yet; qeth is an important driver for Linux on System z; there are lots of investigation ideas for improvements, which we will take care about according to their priorities. I regard your proposed fine-tuning code change as valid, but prioritize it as one with lowest benefit, since it does not really make a difference once compiled. > > > > or we take care about such minor changes, once we touch the code anyway > > How often will this really happen? There is no general rule. Check our git history to answer this question. > > > > due to other reasons. > > I am curious which ones will trigger further related software improvements. > > Regards, > Markus > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
