On 4 January 2016 at 11:05, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03-01-16 16:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures? >>>> >>>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >>>> further comparisons? >>> >>> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. >> >> Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know >> about it, don't you? > > You are asking me, right ;-) ? I have come across my share of MIPS > platforms here at Broadcom, but I still try to avoid them as much as > possible. I was more thinking about author on this patch. But it's indeed an interesting thing, just to know, how MIPS CPU handles branches ;) -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html