> These patches are labour intensive to review because you can't just do > it in the email client. Thanks for your general interest. > Also you were not able to review it properly yourself and introduced > a bug. I admit that it can happen during my software development that I overlook implementation details somehow. > I am often remove initializers but it's normally because I am changing > something else which makes it worthwhile. It is nice to hear that you are also occasionally looking for similar update candidates. > This patch is the correct thing but it's not "worthwhile". I find this view interesting. > Please stop sending cleanup patches, Markus. Just send fixes. How often will source code clean-up fix something? May I resend a consistent patch series for the source file "drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_pkt.c" in the near future? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
