On Sun, 3 Jan 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:00:30 +0100
>
> Pass the address of the data structure element "time" directly in calls
> of the function "rtc_update_irq" instead of an extra initialisation
> for one local variable at the beginning.
Why is it better?
julia
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab-b5ze-s3.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ab-b5ze-s3.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ab-b5ze-s3.c
> index e3a015a..88f1d0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ab-b5ze-s3.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ab-b5ze-s3.c
> @@ -816,7 +816,6 @@ static irqreturn_t _abb5zes3_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> struct i2c_client *client = data;
> struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> struct abb5zes3_rtc_data *rtc_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - struct rtc_device *rtc = rtc_data->rtc;
> u8 regs[ABB5ZES3_CTRL_SEC_LEN];
> int ret, handled = IRQ_NONE;
>
> @@ -844,8 +843,7 @@ static irqreturn_t _abb5zes3_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> /* Check alarm flag */
> if (regs[ABB5ZES3_REG_CTRL2] & ABB5ZES3_REG_CTRL2_AF) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "RTC alarm!\n");
> -
> - rtc_update_irq(rtc, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
> + rtc_update_irq(rtc_data->rtc, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
>
> /* Acknowledge and disable the alarm */
> _abb5zes3_rtc_clear_alarm(dev);
> @@ -857,8 +855,7 @@ static irqreturn_t _abb5zes3_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> /* Check watchdog Timer A flag */
> if (regs[ABB5ZES3_REG_CTRL2] & ABB5ZES3_REG_CTRL2_WTAF) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "RTC timer!\n");
> -
> - rtc_update_irq(rtc, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
> + rtc_update_irq(rtc_data->rtc, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
>
> /*
> * Acknowledge and disable the alarm. Note: WTAF
> --
> 2.6.3
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
