Re: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@xxxxxxxxx>, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roi Dayan <roid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:26:23 +0200
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <567FDB4E.2040000@users.sourceforge.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0

Along with Leon's prefix comment:

Acked-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Source code review around jump label usage
  - From: SF Markus Elfring
- [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations
  - From: SF Markus Elfring

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations
Next by Date: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: api: check for propagation of error from platform_get_irq
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]