On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:36:30PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 13:12:10 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 0/2] InfiniBand-iSER: Refactoring for two function implementations Just a note for the future submissions (no need to respin), we are using different subject line: InfiniBand-iSER: --> IB/iser: > > I suggest to return directly instead of using the jump label "err" > in two functions (which are working without clean-up there). > > Markus Elfring (2): > One jump label less in iser_reg_sig_mr() > One jump label less in isert_reg_sig_mr() > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.6.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
