Re: Documentation-getdelays: Less function calls in usage()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> A single call of the fprintf() function is sufficient for the desired
>> display of the usage information.
> 
> This seems like churn that doesn't actually fix anything.

Will it matter occasionally to reduce the number of function calls
by combining several text fragments into the passing of one longer
string parameter?

Does a warning like "quoted string split across lines" need also
any further considerations for the Linux coding style specification?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=80c75a0f1d81922bf322c0634d1e1a15825a89e6#n4837

Regards,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux