On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:12:12PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:58:51 +0100 > > A few checks would be performed by the mgc_process_recover_log() function > even though it was determined that the passed variable "pages" contained > a null pointer or a call of the alloc_page() function failed. > > 1. Let us return directly if a call of the kcalloc() function failed. > > 2. Corresponding implementation details could be improved by adjustments > for jump targets according to the Linux coding style convention. > > 3. Delete sanity checks then. > > 4. Move an assignment for the variable "eof" behind memory allocations. > > 5. The variable "req" will eventually be set to an appropriate pointer > from a call of the ptlrpc_request_alloc() function. > Thus let us omit the explicit initialisation before. > > 6. Apply a recommendation from the script "checkpatch.pl". That's 6 different things, shouldn't this be 6 different patches? please redo. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
