From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:56:27 +0100 The return type "unsigned long" was used by the cpu_set_cclk() function while the type "int" is provided by the clk_set_rate() function. Let us make this usage consistent. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c index a9f8e5b..2a6f3ac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu) } #ifdef CONFIG_BF60x -unsigned long cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new) +int cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new) { struct clk *clk; int ret; -- 2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html