On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Reuse the type from this poll call instead. > > > > Why use uint when the function return type it unsigned int? > > Do you prefer to express the type modifier once more there? I don't know what the sentence means, but I think that the type should be referenced in a consistent manner. > > On the other hand, why is the function return type unsigned int > > when there is a return of a negative constant? > > This implementation detail can trigger further software development > considerations, can't it? It would seem reasonable to address all of the signed/unsigned issues related to the function return value at once. julia > This is a general issue for the exception handling in several functions. > Would you like to improve any more source code around it? > > Regards, > Markus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
