On 18-12-15, 20:07, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:43:27 +0100
>
> The return type "unsigned long" was used by the cpu_set_cclk() function
> while the type "int" is provided by the clk_set_rate() function.
> Let us make this usage consistent.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> index a9f8e5b..2a6f3ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BF60x
> -unsigned long cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
> +int cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
> {
> struct clk *clk;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
