On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:13:41PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:56:16 +0300
>
> > The problem here is that at the end of the loop we test for if
> > idc->vnic_wait_limit is zero, but since idc->vnic_wait_limit-- is a
> > post-op, it actually ends up set to (u8)-1. I have fixed this by
> > moving the decrement inside the loop.
> >
> > Fixes: 486a5bc77a4a ('qlcnic: Add support for 83xx suspend and resume.')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applied.
Ugh... I appologize, I just noticed a mistake in this one. I have to
do the decrement at the end of the loop and not the start of the loop.
I will send a fix for that on top of this fix.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
