Re: [patch] igbvf: integer overflow in igbvf_change_mtu()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yeah, there is an integer overflow before we check but so far as I can
see it is harmless.  The kernel is full of harmless integer overflows.
I sort of feel like this is the simplest way to write it and the other
ways feel over engineered and unweildy.

Care to propose a patch, though?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux