On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Arnd, > > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:15 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > The same for_each_child_of_node() loop has three 'return' statements' > > aside from the 'break' statement here. I think you should change your > > semantic patch to cover both cases. > > I think Julia's semantic patch covers both cases, but only the cases > where there is one break or return (though I have essentially zero > Coccinelle knowledge, this is all based on guessing looking at the > semantic patch in the cover letter). Normally, it should be OK with lots of returns. And contrary to my previous email, even with return;. Will check on it. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
