OK here it goes ...
There are three non-indention specific smatch warnings in atm/iphase.c
drivers/atm/iphase.c:115 ia_enque_rtn_q() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy
drivers/atm/iphase.c:148 ia_hack_tcq() warn: if();
drivers/atm/iphase.c:1178 rx_pkt() warn: curly braces intended?
this series fixes two of them. The if(); warning would require
restructuring the code to a larger extend. Beyond this there remains a
whooping number of > 2k checkpatch.pl warnings and errors each. Those
can be grouped into
- Direct usage of printk()
- Style issues concerning operators
- Style issues concerning {}
- Indention with spaces, mixed tabs and spaces etc
- Trailing white-spaces
Generally I would not mind cleaning all this up for those who have to
make functional changes to the driver. However, I would like to know
from the maintainers if such an afford would be welcome or not.
Regards,
Tillmann Heidsieck
Tillmann Heidsieck (2):
atm: iphase: return -ENOMEM instead of -1 in case of failed kmalloc()
atm: iphase: fix misleading indention
drivers/atm/iphase.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.6.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
