On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > I guess parallelism would be helpful? > > You could try the following options: > > > > -j n --chunksize 10 --recursive-includes --include-headers-for-types > > > > where n is the number of cores that you want to use. > > Has the make target "coccicheck" direct support for such special parameters? > > > > Parsed header files will be cached within chunks. > > Can the Coccinelle software work together with a kind of "precompiled > header database"? There is an option --use-cache, which caches the compiled code on the disk. But I have not found the effects to be very satisfactory. It is still necessary to read in the serialized code. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
