>> * Will a command-line parameter like "--include-headers-for-types" >> be needed here? > > This argument is never needed. It is only an optimization. It means that > he header files are only considered when collecting type information, but > not whn doing transformation. But this argument has no effect on the set > of types tha are available. I would consider the reuse of the parameter "--recursive-includes" then so that the most function signatures will be available. This has got some consequences on the execution speed and configuration for the source code analysis. Are there any risks to include too many functions? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html