On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 03:29:25 PM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The intent was to test "proc[i].handler" instead of "proc->handler".
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> index c1ff58d..6c0f079 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
> for (i = 0; i < proc_num; i++) {
> if (entry->type != proc[i].id)
> continue;
> - if (!proc->handler || proc[i].handler(entry, table_end))
> + if (!proc[i].handler ||
> + proc[i].handler(entry, table_end))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> proc->count++;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
