Hello,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:00:24PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 421 for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
> 422 if (!(mask & (1 << i)))
> 423 continue;
>
> Probably maks is always valid is what helps us but basically the static
> checker is suggesting that instead of DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE we should
> be using PCI_ROM_RESOURCE or PCIM_IOMAP_MAX. It could be that this was
> deliberate though...
Looks like a silly mistake on my part. Care to submit a patch?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
