On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:54:33AM -0700, walter harms wrote:
> Am 30.08.2015 20:05, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> > if (IS_ERR(drvdata->mi2s_bit_clk[dai_id])) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > "%s() error getting mi2s-bit-clk: %ld\n",
> > - __func__,
> PTR_ERR(drvdata->mi2s_bit_clk[i]));
> > + __func__,
> > + PTR_ERR(drvdata->mi2s_bit_clk[dai_id]));
> > return PTR_ERR(drvdata->mi2s_bit_clk[dai_id]);
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> just a note:
> using a shorter name instead of drvdata->mi2s_bit_clk[dai_id] whould help
> to make the code
> more readable (yes, the other code is alike). something like:
>
> struct clk *tmp = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev,clk_name);
>
> if (IS_ERR(tmp)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,"%s() error getting mi2s-bit-clk:
> %ld\n",__func__, PTR_ERR(tmp));
> return PTR_ERR(tmp);
> }
> drvdata->mi2s_bit_clk[dai_id]=tmp;
Yes, it would make the code more readable.
>
>
> just one minor:
> the dev_warn() just before says: " error getting mi2s-osr-clk" may be it
> should be "warnig ..."
> That will make it more easy to rep for real error in a log.
"error [gs]etting" could be re-phrased to "could not [gs]et". The term
"error" was not meant to indicate the log level, but evidently, can
cause some confusion for someone reading the logs.
--
Kenneth Westfield
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
