Am 15.06.2015 21:04, schrieb ChengYi He: > kmalloc() returns void pointer. > > Signed-off-by: ChengYi He <chengyihetaipei@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_mon.c | 2 +- > drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_mon.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_mon.c > index d5860ce..bc7feb4 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_mon.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_mon.c > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int mon_mgmt_tx(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *buf, size_t len) > len += sizeof(struct tx_complete_mon_data *); > #endif > > - mgmt_tx->buff = (char *)kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC); > + mgmt_tx->buff = kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC); > if (mgmt_tx->buff == NULL) { > PRINT_ER("Failed to allocate memory for mgmt_tx buff\n"); > return WILC_FAIL; > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c > index 5f87148..c1e9272 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/linux_wlan.c > @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void linux_wlan_dbg(uint8_t *buff) > static void *linux_wlan_malloc_atomic(uint32_t sz) > { > char *pntr = NULL; > - pntr = (char *)kmalloc(sz, GFP_ATOMIC); > + pntr = kmalloc(sz, GFP_ATOMIC); > PRINT_D(MEM_DBG, "Allocating %d bytes at address %p\n", sz, pntr); > return (void *)pntr; > > @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static void *linux_wlan_malloc_atomic(uint32_t sz) > static void *linux_wlan_malloc(uint32_t sz) > { > char *pntr = NULL; > - pntr = (char *)kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + pntr = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > PRINT_D(MEM_DBG, "Allocating %d bytes at address %p\n", sz, pntr); > return (void *)pntr; > } > @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ void linux_wlan_free(void *vp) > static void *internal_alloc(uint32_t size, uint32_t flag) > { > char *pntr = NULL; > - pntr = (char *)kmalloc(size, flag); > + pntr = kmalloc(size, flag); > PRINT_D(MEM_DBG, "Allocating %d bytes at address %p\n", size, pntr); > return (void *)pntr; > } hi your fix is correct, but the code is strange. 1. char *pntr = NULL; not needed 2. you could collaps linux_wlan_malloc,linux_wlan_malloc_atomic into internal_alloc but why do this functions exists in the first place ? internal_alloc is kmalloc+PRINT_D, this looks like a left over from some debug session to me. why no replace the private alloc with a kmalloc ? just my to cents, wh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in