Re: [patch] drm/amdgpu: potential NULL dereference on error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 11.06.2015 10:49, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> debugfs_create_file() can return an error pointer if debugfs is disabled
> or it can return NULL on error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 36be03c..adba2a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -1980,6 +1980,8 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_regs_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>  				  adev, &amdgpu_debugfs_regs_fops);
>  	if (IS_ERR(ent))
>  		return PTR_ERR(ent);
> +	if (!ent)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	i_size_write(ent->d_inode, adev->rmmio_size);
>  	adev->debugfs_regs = ent;



would  PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() by an option ?

on the other hand,
why does debugfs_create_file() does not return -ENOMEN instead of NULL ?


re,
 wh


> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux