On 11.06.2015 10:19, Dan Carpenter wrote:
We already checked "if (r)" so there is no need to check again.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Dan,
thanks for taking a look into this. This patch and the other two you
send today are Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
That code was branched of from Radeon it is possible that the same
changes apply there as well. Since it looks like you created those
patches at least partially automatically could you run your tool on the
Radeon code once more as well?
Thanks in advance,
Christian.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
index 5533434..b7d0425 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_kms.c
@@ -111,12 +111,9 @@ int amdgpu_driver_load_kms(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
/* Call ACPI methods: require modeset init
* but failure is not fatal
*/
- if (!r) {
- acpi_status = amdgpu_acpi_init(adev);
- if (acpi_status)
- dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev,
- "Error during ACPI methods call\n");
- }
+ acpi_status = amdgpu_acpi_init(adev);
+ if (acpi_status)
+ dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev, "Error during ACPI methods call\n");
if (amdgpu_device_is_px(dev)) {
pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev->dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
