Re: [patch] ipvs: prevent some underflows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hello,

On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:16:23PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> > 	May be we should use min(dev->mtu, 1500) instead of
> > dev->mtu to avoid sending too large packets for the common
> > case.
> 
> That will put an upper limit on it, no? If the load balancers share a
> big MTU, why not use it?

	Yes, without any configuration (eg. sysctl value),
such defaults should reduce the chance for incompatibilities.
I.e. we should not send more than 1500 and should be able to
receive at least 1500.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux