Hi,
On 04-06-15 10:52, Dan Carpenter wrote:
We already know status is negative because of the earlier check so there
is no need to check again.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Makes sense:
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mauro, can you pick this one up directly please?
Regards,
Hans
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sn9c2028.c b/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sn9c2028.c
index c75b738..4f2050a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sn9c2028.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/gspca/sn9c2028.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int sn9c2028_long_command(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev, u8 *command)
status = sn9c2028_read1(gspca_dev);
if (status < 0) {
pr_err("long command status read error %d\n", status);
- return (status < 0) ? status : -EIO;
+ return status;
}
memset(reading, 0, 4);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
