Re: firmware: fix possible use after free on name on asynchronous request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 29.05.2015 02:45, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:02:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Hello Luis R. Rodriguez,
>>
>> The patch f9692b2699bd: "firmware: fix possible use after free on
>> name on asynchronous request" from May 12, 2015, leads to the
>> following static checker warning:
>>
>> 	drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1311 request_firmware_nowait()
>> 	warn: possible memory leak of 'fw_work'
>>
>> drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>>   1296  int
>>   1297  request_firmware_nowait(
>>   1298          struct module *module, bool uevent,
>>   1299          const char *name, struct device *device, gfp_t gfp, void *context,
>>   1300          void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
>>   1301  {
>>   1302          struct firmware_work *fw_work;
>>   1303  
>>   1304          fw_work = kzalloc(sizeof(struct firmware_work), gfp);
>>   1305          if (!fw_work)
>>   1306                  return -ENOMEM;
>>   1307  
>>   1308          fw_work->module = module;
>>   1309          fw_work->name = kstrdup_const(name, gfp);
>>   1310          if (!fw_work->name)
>>
>> kfree(fw_work).
>>
>>   1311                  return -ENOMEM;
>>   1312          fw_work->device = device;
>>   1313          fw_work->context = context;
>>   1314          fw_work->cont = cont;
>>   1315          fw_work->opt_flags = FW_OPT_NOWAIT | FW_OPT_FALLBACK |
>>   1316                  (uevent ? FW_OPT_UEVENT : FW_OPT_USERHELPER);
>>   1317  
>>   1318          if (!try_module_get(module)) {
>>   1319                  kfree_const(fw_work->name);
>>   1320                  kfree(fw_work);
>>   1321                  return -EFAULT;
>>   1322          }
>>   1323  
>>   1324          get_device(fw_work->device);
>>   1325          INIT_WORK(&fw_work->work, request_firmware_work_func);
>>   1326          schedule_work(&fw_work->work);
>>   1327          return 0;
>>   1328  }
> 
> Bleh, thanks, I'm submitting this next:
> 
>>From 30da66c4bb1da33f1a789099e4b02e479332f4a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:43:30 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] firmware: add missing kfree for work on async call
> 
> The recent fix to use kstrdup_const() failed to add a
> kfree upon failure of name allocation...
> 
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 8c3aa3c..9c42883 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@ -1307,8 +1307,10 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
>  
>  	fw_work->module = module;
>  	fw_work->name = kstrdup_const(name, gfp);
> -	if (!fw_work->name)
> +	if (!fw_work->name) {
> +		kfree(fw_work);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
>  	fw_work->device = device;
>  	fw_work->context = context;
>  	fw_work->cont = cont;


Hi Luis,
if it is possible to change firmware_work
and make char *name a name[] you could alloc via.

kzalloc(sizeof(struct firmware_work)+strlen(name)+1, gfp);

perhaps that zero length can make thinks more easy.
(at least you need only one free).

hope that helps,

re,
 wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux