Re: [patch] HID: rmi: fix some harmless BIT() mistakes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 May 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> These defines are used like this:
> 
> 	if (!(test_bit(RMI_STARTED, &hdata->flags)))
> 
> So the intent was to use bits 0, 1 and 2 but because of the extra BIT()
> shifts we're actually using 1, 2 and 4.  It's harmless because it's done
> consistently but static checkers will complain.
> 
> Fixes: 9fb6bf02e3ad ('HID: rmi: introduce RMI driver for Synaptics touchpads')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> index 368ffdf..2f3e51d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
>  #define RMI_SET_RMI_MODE_REPORT_ID	0x0f /* Feature Report */
>  
>  /* flags */
> -#define RMI_READ_REQUEST_PENDING	BIT(0)
> -#define RMI_READ_DATA_PENDING		BIT(1)
> -#define RMI_STARTED			BIT(2)
> +#define RMI_READ_REQUEST_PENDING	0
> +#define RMI_READ_DATA_PENDING		1
> +#define RMI_STARTED			2

Applied to for-4.2/upstream, thanks.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux