[PATCH] bus: arm-ccn: Handle correctly no-more-cpus case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When migrating events the driver picks another cpu using
cpumask_any_but() function, which returns value >= nr_cpu_ids
when there is none available, not a negative value as the code
assumed. Fixed now.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
---
Another day, another arm-ccn.c update...

This time Dan's static checker spotted unsigned int target
being expected to carry negative values. Fixed now.

Interestingly enough, cpumask_any_but() implementation (and its
normal prototype) returns int, but version for NR_CPUS == 1 case,
inlined in linux/cpumask.h returns unsigned int...

 drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
index 7d9879e..cc322fb 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c
@@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &dt->cpu))
 			break;
 		target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
-		if (target < 0)
+		if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
 			break;
 		perf_pmu_migrate_context(&dt->pmu, cpu, target);
 		cpumask_set_cpu(target, &dt->cpu);
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux