On May 2, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a > function, obd_cpt_alloc. > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should > the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be > inlined into the call sites? I think we don't need this function at all, we can use kzalloc/kzalloc_node directly with cfs_cpt_spread_node call in. What we do need is obd_cpt_alloc_large similar to how we need obd_alloc_large (I know I still owe you a proper patch with that). The only differences between the two would then be passing down of the cpt (and it's use) or not. Bye, Oleg-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html